>>Heh, I think you misunderstood my second message. I meant that we >>wanted to make the change for cosmetic reasons, not that it WAS a >>cosmetic change. After reading on how the branches are created, I >>understand why you don't want to mess with those. However, I don't >>understand what the problem is with updating the revision numbers on >>the main trunk. Am I seriously missing something because I see people >>doing this all the time? :) Or are all these people just treading into >>dangerous waters? And yes, we know how to use symbolic tags and have >>been using them, so the issue isn't that we don't know how to do that. >>This is just a curiosity thing at this point in time. > >As a general rule, I resist any changes "for cosmetic reasons" to a >non-cosmetic process, tool or data.
Another possibility could be to start a new module/repository. Then it's quite clear where the files come from, even if they only have 1.x revisions. Of course that needs some work as well, new checkouts... bye Fabi _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
