[ On Wednesday, February 2, 2005 at 18:23:08 (-0300), Alexandre Augusto Drummond Barroso wrote: ] > Subject: RE: Renaming (was Re: 'cvs add' client/server semantics) > > I agree with you. I think the result from an annotate would be > completely different when using a "move" operation instead of > traditional "mv-remove-add" operation.
You are thinking of, or wishing for, something at a higher level than a simple "cvs annotate". (and "annotate" is the wrong word for what you mean, especially in the context of CVS where it has an explicit meaning) The idea behind using a wrapper script to implement "cvsmove" is that it would create predictable, parsable, log entries. This would make it much more reliable for another _external_ history analysis tool to decipher what was intended when it sees that a file was removed from one location then another file with identical content was added to a new location. -- Greg A. Woods H:+1 416 218-0098 W:+1 416 489-5852 x122 VE3TCP RoboHack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Planix, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Secrets of the Weird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list Info-cvs@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs