[ On Wednesday, February 2, 2005 at 18:23:08 (-0300), Alexandre Augusto
Drummond Barroso wrote: ]
> Subject: RE: Renaming (was Re: 'cvs add' client/server semantics)
>
> I agree with you. I think the result from an annotate would be
> completely different when using a "move" operation instead of
> traditional "mv-remove-add" operation.
You are thinking of, or wishing for, something at a higher level than a
simple "cvs annotate". (and "annotate" is the wrong word for what you
mean, especially in the context of CVS where it has an explicit meaning)
The idea behind using a wrapper script to implement "cvsmove" is that it
would create predictable, parsable, log entries.
This would make it much more reliable for another _external_ history
analysis tool to decipher what was intended when it sees that a file was
removed from one location then another file with identical content was
added to a new location.
--
Greg A. Woods
H:+1 416 218-0098 W:+1 416 489-5852 x122 VE3TCP RoboHack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Planix, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Secrets of the Weird <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
