bobby temper wrote: > I also agree with Jim, but it might be hard to convince > content people that > they have to go throught a staging first, for simple stuff. In my experience, it's usually the simple stuff that causes the most headaches ;=)
> I'm wondering if > it would be better to install a cvs client, and have the code > being a "cvs > checkout" copy. That way, we could do like you're proposing, > with cvs diff. > I'm actually just wondering if doing it that way has some > drawbacks, vs > doing a "cvs export/tar-gzip/scp" procedure. The drawback would be having to administer another installation of a cvs client. Not much overhead, I think. One advantage - you can check in changes directly from any production hot-fixes. -- Jim Hyslop Senior Software Designer Leitch Technology International Inc. ( http://www.leitch.com ) Columnist, C/C++ Users Journal ( http://www.cuj.com/experts ) _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
