David Leskovac writes: > > None of the developers are malicious. The problem came up > because on 3 separate occasions, a developer who is not > very familiar with CVS somehow deleted 3 active branches.
That's much less likely with current releases of CVS since it now refuses to disturb existing branch tags unless you use a special option (-B) to force it to. -Larry Jones I wonder if I can grow fangs when my baby teeth fall out. -- Calvin _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list Info-cvs@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs