David Leskovac writes:
> 
> None of the developers are malicious. The problem came up
> because on 3 separate occasions, a developer who is not
> very familiar with CVS somehow deleted 3 active branches.

That's much less likely with current releases of CVS since it now
refuses to disturb existing branch tags unless you use a special
option (-B) to force it to.

-Larry Jones

I wonder if I can grow fangs when my baby teeth fall out. -- Calvin


_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
Info-cvs@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs

Reply via email to