Does this mean, no one receiving mails OR this guy's id no longer exists??
-- Satya Prasad
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:24:09 +0200
X-DSNContext: 335a7efd - 4523 - 00000001 - 80040546
Subject: Benachrichtung
zum
=?unicode-1-1-utf-7?Q?+ANw-bermittlungsstatus
(Fehlgeschlagen)?=
X-Fetchmail-Warning: recipient address [EMAIL PROTECTED] didn't match any local name
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.41
Dies ist eine automatisch erstellte Benachrichtigung +APw-ber den Zustellstatus.
+ANw-bermittlung an folgende Empf+AOQ-nger fehlgeschlagen.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reporting-MTA: dns;prnts05.pruefrex.local Received-From-MTA: dns;pruefrex.de Arrival-Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:24:09 +0200
Final-Recipient: rfc822;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action: failed Status: 5.1.1
Thread-Topic: [SPAM (Non-existent user)] - newbie question: issues with gserver method - Local recipient does not exist
Received: from mail pickup service by prnts05.pruefrex.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:24:09 +0200
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx30.stngva01.us.mxservers.net (204.202.242.41) by mail08a.verio.de (RS ver 1.0.95vs) with SMTP id 4-0210321049 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 08:17:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165] (EHLO lists.gnu.org) by mx30.stngva01.us.mxservers.net (mxl_mta-1.3.8-10p4) with ESMTP id 7b126524.22519.094.mx30.stngva01.us.mxservers.net; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 02:16:23 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJmLB-0000k3-SI for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 01:47:38 -0400
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DJmHl-0000DN-4F for info-cvs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 01:44:06 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DJmHf-0000Bg-JI for info-cvs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 01:44:02 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJmHe-0008SG-Dh for info-cvs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 01:43:58 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.181
Received: from [66.80.10.146] (helo=guri.intoto.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DJmVP-0007ot-J0 for info-cvs@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Apr 2005 01:58:11 -0400
Received: from brahma.intotoind.com ([172.16.1.10]) by guri.intoto.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005040722564708715 for <info-cvs@gnu.org>; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 22:56:48 -0700
Received: from sys-int1.intotoind.com (1mc50.intotoind.com [172.16.1.50]) by brahma.intotoind.com (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j385vHrZ014668 for <info-cvs@gnu.org>; Fri, 8 Apr 2005 11:27:17 +0530
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.1.2
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 11:25:09 +0530
To: <info-cvs@gnu.org>
From: "Satya Prasad D.V" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="us-ascii"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.41
Subject: [SPAM (Non-existent user)] - newbie question: issues with gserver method - Local recipient does not exist
X-BeenThere: info-cvs@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Announcements and discussions for the CVS version control system <info-cvs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs>, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/info-cvs>
List-Post: <mailto:info-cvs@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs>, <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam: [F=0.0100000000; heur=0.500(0); stat=0.010; spamtraq-heur=0.500(2005040712)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-SOURCE-IP: [199.232.76.165]
X-Loop-Detect:
Status:
X-GFI-P2E: PRNTS05
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Apr 2005 06:24:09.0329 (UTC) FILETIME=[92ACBE10:01C53C03]
Hi,
I have configured CVS with gssapi and am using gserver connection method to access the server. I have an empty passwd file in CVSROOT and set systemauth=no in config file to ensure kerberos auth is used.
I am able to connect to server with kerberos tickets and check out and checkin code. However I see two issues vis-a-vis pserver approach.
1. the server requires a local user id with same id as the kerberos authenticated user.
2. The file owner ships for committed files are changed to that of the local mapped user.
In pserver, we had a system-user specification to map several users to one system user. Is the same possible, with gserver also? If not, how can I ensure multiple users can modify same file without issues? I am using a Fedora Core3 server.
I am worried the permission changes might affect, as several users keep changing files on my repository continuously.
Regards, -- Satya Prasad
_______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list Info-cvs@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
_______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list Info-cvs@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
