Sergei Organov writes: > > How is it different from update -A *without* copying anything on top of > it? My experience is that update -A would perform regular merge of > current changes into the head version. Am I missing something?
You're missing the fact that copying an old file over top of the current file will wipe out any subsequent changes that were merged into the current file by the update. -Larry Jones The problem with the future is that it keeps turning into the present. -- Hobbes _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
