> I am simply asking for an (optional) review step to prevent the > repository being poluted with crap code.
Okay, but that isn't what the repository is. The repository, by definition, has to contain +all+ the code the developers have finished coding. Maybe it would be useful to change the repository so it was "all the code the developers have finished coding, that isn't crap" [pardon my simplification] - but that would make CVS a +much+ more complicated product. Which in my view is not a good move. By it's very nature the repository +will+ contain crap code; unfixed bugs; dead-end development paths; etc. That's exactly the point of having a repository. It stores everything. Because you don't know what you might need to back out to at a later date. _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
