> Is there something I've missed? If not, > is there any reason *not* to add this > feature to CVS? If it's not a horrible > idea, what's the best way to suggest it?
On the CVSNT project (free/GPL just like CVS, runs on Linux, Unix, Windows etc) we discovered the same problem (as many have). CVSNT implemented a lock server instead (again: on Linux/Unix/Windows etc). That way if the client bails for any reason (as PC's often do) the server is always left clean. The lock server also allows us to do atomic checkout, service broadcasts, repository synchronisation etc. Regards, Arthur _______________________________________________ info-cvs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
