"Larry Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gary writes: > > > > One thing I've noticed which is causing a problem is that there appears to > > be a problem with rtag -b commands in that the revision number for the tag > > is incorrect, e.g. the branch tag should be revision 2.4.0.2 but comes out > > as 2.4.2 with no other indication that it was a branch tag. > > 2.4.0.2 is a "magic" branch tag -- the actual branch *is* 2.4.2. You > know it's a branch because there's an odd number of components. >
Sorry, I completley misled you there. I'd be happy if the taginfo hook received an odd number of components but it doesn't. If I add a branch tag to revision 2.4.2.2, the information that comes through from taginfo is simply 2.4.2.2 with no indication that there was a branch tag, niether the magic revision or the three component version - either would be good but as far as I can see, you can't tell from the informaiton provided by taginfo wether the tag operation was a tag or a branch tag. _______________________________________________ info-cvs mailing list info-cvs@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
