Michael Haggerty writes: > > I work on the cvs2svn project (I hope that doesn't make me persona non > grata :-)
It doesn't. :-) > An example is shown in the attachment. The problem is that the delta > text for revision 1.1 appears in the file two times. (In fact, the > delta text appears in the first copy and the full text in the second > copy.) Empirically, both RCS's "co" and "cvs co" use the first version > of the delta and do not report an error. RCS's "rlog" prints the log > message from the first version, whereas "cvs log" fails on this file > with an error message. I've never heard of such a thing, so I very much doubt that it was caused by CVS or RCS. Since 1.1 is the initial revision, it *should* contain the full text. Since the cronologically second (physically first) 1.1 delta text is empty, it may have been a botched attempt to manually add a log message without actually revising the file. -Larry Jones I never get to do anything fun. -- Calvin _______________________________________________ info-cvs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
