On 02/27/2012 08:09 PM, Shivani Rao wrote: > [...] > a) How do tags really work? I have read tons of tutorials, but still > not clear. Does a symbolic name for a file stay after it is tagged?
A file tag is just a symbol that refers to a specific revision of the file. If a whole repository was tagged at once (this is not necessarily the case), then the collection of all files at their respective versions can be treated as a single repository-wide tag. > b) If I want to track software evolution from one "tag" till "another" > can I use the order found out as stated above? Is the latest tag given > to a file, the truest way to find the latest revision (tag) it belongs > to? > c) Why is it that I se aspectj e the tags at a different date when cvs2cl uses > the chrono option? There is no metadata stored with a CVS tag. CVS does not record when the tag was created or by whom. Therefore the only way for a tool to associate dates with tags is by using heuristics based on the dates of the revisions that were tagged and of other nearby revisions. Obviously cvs2cl's heuristics do not give consistent results when run with different options. For that matter, even inferring repository-wide commits from the file-by-file data stored by CVS is nontrivial and tools vary widely in their ability to do this well. cvs2svn [1], a tool for converting CVS repositories to Subversion/git/bzr/hg, does a very careful job of inferring commits and tag/branch dates from the CVS history. If you have access to the CVS repository for aspectj, you might consider using cvs2svn to convert the repository to git, then using git's excellent history-viewing tools to analyze the project history. Alternatively you could use Subversion as your vehicle, but IMHO Subversion's graphical tools are not as good as git's. By this I do not mean that the project should change version control systems [2]; I just mean that you can use a temporary copy in another VCS for inspection. [Disclaimer: I am the cvs2svn maintainer.] Michael [1] http://cvs2svn.tigris.org [2] ...though they probably should :-) -- Michael Haggerty [email protected] http://softwareswirl.blogspot.com/
