auto_nlist i think comes from
/usr/local/include/ucd-snmp/auto_nlist.h
i couldnt figure out how to make gcc see it, so i just removed references to
snmp from compilation as a quick fix. after that i didnt have any trouble,
and compilation is complete
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "GOMBAS Gabor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2000 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: building 2.0.9
> On 23-Dec-00 at 08:41, GOMBAS Gabor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 11:26:42PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > > /usr/local/lib/libucdmibs.so: undefined reference to
`auto_nlist_value'
> > > > /usr/local/lib/libucdmibs.so: undefined reference to
`kvm_getswapinfo'
> > > > /usr/local/lib/libucdmibs.so: undefined reference to `auto_nlist'
> > > > /usr/local/lib/libucdagent.so: undefined reference to `kvm_geterr'
> > > > /usr/local/lib/libucdagent.so: undefined reference to `kvm_read'
> > > > /usr/local/lib/libucdagent.so: undefined reference to
`kvm_openfiles'
> > > > *** Error code 1
> > >
> > > find /usr/include -name '*.h' -print | xargs grep kvm_getswapinfo
> > > shows it in <kvm.h>. The rest of the kvm items are probably also
> > > in there. My first guess would be a missing system-specific include.
> >
> > You are completely missing the point. It's a linker error, so it has
> > absolutely _nothing_ to do with headers. You have to find out which
> > library contains the kvm_* functions and add it to the command line.
> > I do not know FreeBSD but on Solaris you would need to add "-lkvm"...
>
> Argh. Yep, you're right - I shouldn't try to answer technical
> questions when I'm that tired.
>
> The grep was still a good starting point because it indicates that
> the kvm_* entities should be coming from a system library. So the
> next step is:
>
> nm --print-file-name /usr/lib/lib*.so /usr/lib/lib*.a \
> 2>/dev/null | grep '[Td] kvm_'
>
> This shows that they are in, unsurprisingly, libkvm.a and libkvm_p.a.
> So the link for FreeBSD is missing '-lkvm'. (Or, possibly, has it
> too early in the list.)
>
> I still don't know where auto_nlist is supposed to be coming from.
> Grepping through the source and examining the code around references
> might give a clue based on what it appears to be doing.
>
>
>
> -Pat
>
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "GOMBAS Gabor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 23, 2000 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: building 2.0.9
> On 23-Dec-00 at 08:41, GOMBAS Gabor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 11:26:42PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > > /usr/local/lib/libucdmibs.so: undefined reference to
`auto_nlist_value'
> > > > /usr/local/lib/libucdmibs.so: undefined reference to
`kvm_getswapinfo'
> > > > /usr/local/lib/libucdmibs.so: undefined reference to `auto_nlist'
> > > > /usr/local/lib/libucdagent.so: undefined reference to `kvm_geterr'
> > > > /usr/local/lib/libucdagent.so: undefined reference to `kvm_read'
> > > > /usr/local/lib/libucdagent.so: undefined reference to
`kvm_openfiles'
> > > > *** Error code 1
> > >
> > > find /usr/include -name '*.h' -print | xargs grep kvm_getswapinfo
> > > shows it in <kvm.h>. The rest of the kvm items are probably also
> > > in there. My first guess would be a missing system-specific include.
> >
> > You are completely missing the point. It's a linker error, so it has
> > absolutely _nothing_ to do with headers. You have to find out which
> > library contains the kvm_* functions and add it to the command line.
> > I do not know FreeBSD but on Solaris you would need to add "-lkvm"...
>
> Argh. Yep, you're right - I shouldn't try to answer technical
> questions when I'm that tired.
>
> The grep was still a good starting point because it indicates that
> the kvm_* entities should be coming from a system library. So the
> next step is:
>
> nm --print-file-name /usr/lib/lib*.so /usr/lib/lib*.a \
> 2>/dev/null | grep '[Td] kvm_'
>
> This shows that they are in, unsurprisingly, libkvm.a and libkvm_p.a.
> So the link for FreeBSD is missing '-lkvm'. (Or, possibly, has it
> too early in the list.)
>
> I still don't know where auto_nlist is supposed to be coming from.
> Grepping through the source and examining the code around references
> might give a clue based on what it appears to be doing.
>
>
>
> -Pat
>