www.surf.co.uk
ps: There's supposed to be a better patch "out there", but I do not know an url (does
anyone else?).
Tarjei
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick LIN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 8:10 AM
Subject: Re: Cyrus-IMAPD and LDAP
> hi,
>
> i probably miss some mail :(
>
> wheere i can find this patch
>
> best regards,
> Patrick
>
> Tarjei Huse wrote:
>
> > Hia!
> >
> > How hard would it be to get this in as a feature in the next sasl version?
> > It seems to me the about 1/8 of all posts on the cyrus list are solved with
> > this patch.
> >
> >
> > Also, does the patch support useing ssl encryption between the host and the
> > ldap server?
> >
> > Tarjei
> > (Who is very greatfull to all the people who has ever done any coding on
> > the sasl-ldap patch ;D )
> >
> >
> >>Hey Prune,
> >>
> >>
> >>Friday, August 03, 2001, 3:24:05 AM, you wrote:
> >>
> >>P> Hi
> >>
> >>P> Isn't it the same thing as using pam_ldap for imap auth ??
> >>
> >>P> Prune
> >>
> >>Pretty much. But Cyrus Imapd 2.0.x and pam_ldap and OpenLDAP 2.0.x do
> >>not mix well together at all. I tried for 2 weeks to get any sort of
> >>authentication to work (note, that pam_ldap worked for postfix). And my
> >>ldap logs all said the cyrus searches were successful, so I suppose the
> >>bug lies in pam_ldap.
> >>
> >>Also, the patch is useful for those UNIX systems that don't have or use
> >>PAM.
> >>
> >>--
> >> Kevin
> >>
> >
> >
> > ____________________
> > Tarjei Huse
> > 920 63 413
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> ____________
> __________________________________( /
> ________| | /
> \ | This message is transmitted by | \
> \ | 100 % recycled electrons |___________\
> / |__________________________________(
> /__________)
>
>
>
