--On Thursday, January 24, 2002 12:04 PM -0500 Ken Murchison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, I mentioned this to Larry a while back, but he didn't really like > the idea. I don't remember his exact reasoning, but I think it had > something to do with not knowing whether the reject/vacation message > ever got sent or something. Larry? > > I would be nice if there was some kind of LMTP/ESMTP backchannel for > sending out a responses to a message just delivered, via the already > open connection to the MTA. I think SMTP TURN may do this, but its use > is deprecated. Hmm. Why not just jave LMTP keep an SMTP connection (or pool of connections) permanently open, and send all messages through that using RSET after each one? Wouldn't that be more efficient than calling sendmail/exim etc once per message if the volume gets to be large? -- Cyrus Daboo
