No, this is how it works in any remotely recent version. Larry
From: "Rich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 20:08:48 -0000 I've looked for the answer to this for a while, but if I've missed it = because I can't see the wood for the trees then apologies in advance. = Basically I would prefer to have all my users on one level "../user" = rather than in the "../user/a..z" sub-dirs - is this still possible as = the searches I've done seem to indicate that this may have been the = default procedure for prior versions.
