>>>>> On Tue, 14 May 2002 12:09:14 -0600,
>>>>> Scott M Likens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (sml) writes:

sml> May 13 15:52:32 shell postfix/lmtp[21546]: [ID 197553 mail.info]
sml> 614D48A84E: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
sml> relay=shell.bourg.net[207.229.76.2], delay=1, status=deferred (host
sml> shell.bourg.net[207.229.76.2] said: 430 Authentication required)

Ugh, README_FILES/LMTP_README really does need updating.  I should
try to do that during our inter-session.  Anyway, if you're doing
LMTP over a TCP connection, you'll either need to use LMTP-AUTH
(like SMTP-AUTH), or use the "-a" flag as in:

    SERVICES { 
        ... 
        lmtp cmd="lmtpd -a" listen="[127.0.0.1]:lmtp" prefork=0 
        ... 
    } 

Though, if you use the "-a" flag, be sure to restrict access to
this LMTP server.  This can be done by either binding to a specific
IP address as done above and/or by using tcp_wrappers.

sml> Also has anyone seen this with the new postfix 1.1.9-Experimental?

sml> May 13 15:39:38 shell postfix/lmtp[17534]: [ID 947731 mail.warning]
sml> warning: spurious attribute sender in input from lmtp socket

Not yet.  I was waiting for the dust to settle a bit before trying
latest Postfix snapshot/release.

-- 
Amos

Reply via email to