>>>>> On Tue, 14 May 2002 12:09:14 -0600, >>>>> Scott M Likens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (sml) writes:
sml> May 13 15:52:32 shell postfix/lmtp[21546]: [ID 197553 mail.info] sml> 614D48A84E: to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, sml> relay=shell.bourg.net[207.229.76.2], delay=1, status=deferred (host sml> shell.bourg.net[207.229.76.2] said: 430 Authentication required) Ugh, README_FILES/LMTP_README really does need updating. I should try to do that during our inter-session. Anyway, if you're doing LMTP over a TCP connection, you'll either need to use LMTP-AUTH (like SMTP-AUTH), or use the "-a" flag as in: SERVICES { ... lmtp cmd="lmtpd -a" listen="[127.0.0.1]:lmtp" prefork=0 ... } Though, if you use the "-a" flag, be sure to restrict access to this LMTP server. This can be done by either binding to a specific IP address as done above and/or by using tcp_wrappers. sml> Also has anyone seen this with the new postfix 1.1.9-Experimental? sml> May 13 15:39:38 shell postfix/lmtp[17534]: [ID 947731 mail.warning] sml> warning: spurious attribute sender in input from lmtp socket Not yet. I was waiting for the dust to settle a bit before trying latest Postfix snapshot/release. -- Amos