Due to the amount of interest I have decided to put this information on the
web at http://hbeatty.mystarband.net. Please give me a week or so to get it
complete.

Thanks,
Hank

----- Original Message -----
From: "David H. Lynch Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Hank Beatty'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 6:39 PM
Subject: RE: SASL Docs


> While I still hope to get something else working -
>
> In my perfect world I would have kerberos working between the
> systems (right now I have working krb5.conf, and a keytab, and I can
> kinit against the W2K KDC, but saslauthd/pam_krb5, saslauthd/kerberos5
> and GSSAPI all are unhappy)
> of course in my dreams either MIT or Heimdal kerberos knows how
> to work as the kdc for W2K, and maybe openldap knows how to replace M$'s
> LDAP, .... In fact while I am dreaming AutoCAD runs under Linux and W2K
> can go to @#$?.
>
> In a less perfect world (or maybe not) I would have either
> saslauthd/pam_smbpass or saslauthd/pam_winbind working.
> I am working on that right now, with marginal success.
>
> But I could give up soon and then I would settle for anything
> that did not require me to maintain multiple user lists all over the
> place. Anyway, yes I would greatly appreciate whatever information you
> can share on authenticating against a W2K AD. This is probably the only
> thing stopping me from killing off exchange. Exchange has died for me
> almost every xmas holiday for the past 4 or 5 years, requiring massive
> amounts of effort to recover and just generally ruining my holiday. My
> goal is to kill it off before it kills me.
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:owner-info-cyrus@;lists.andrew.cmu.edu] On Behalf Of Hank Beatty
> Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 2:26 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: SASL Docs
>
>
> David,
>
> I have a setup where I have Cyrus is using saslauthd. Saslauthd is setup
> to use PAM. Pam is using PAM_LDAP and PAM_LDAP is authenticating against
> a MS AD domain controller.
>
> That was probably the long way around, but it made sense at the time.
>
> If you (or anyone else) is interested in how I did this let me know.
>
>

Reply via email to