> according the rfc: > Each mailbox has zero or more implementation-defined named "quota > roots". Each quota root has zero or more resource limits. All > mailboxes that share the same named quota root share the resource > limits of the quota root. > > that make me think that INBOX and INBOX.Trash share the same named quota
as long as you only have a quota set on INBOX (that is only one quota-root for the complete account-hierarchy at toplevel) > and therefor raising the quota on inbox.Trash doesn't help. It does! It sets a new root for all folders under inbox.Trash and inbox.Trash itself overwriting the quota-root set one level higher on inbox! > But to come back to the QUOTA idea. It's probably not a good idea. Much > better would be to write an RFC for IMAP MOVE. But that's discussed before > if I'm correct. Setting a quota-root explicitly on the trash folder solves your problem! You could even set the quota of inbox.Trash to 0 which means infinite. --Christian