a tip: for rh9 there is an excellent source rpm at http://www.invoca.ch which you may rebuild or use its config as an example for a successfull build.
> On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 23:02, David Brown wrote: >> * Was krb5 already properly installed when I >> installed Red Hat 9a, or do I need to re-install or >> reconfigure it somehow? > > I think it's installed if you install the openssl development libraries. > >> * Why am I doing this anyway when I'm not concerned >> about having Kerberos at the moment? I tried >> --without-krb and --without-krb5 options but got the >> same results. Can't I leave out Kerberos? > > The problem as I understand it is that the openssl development tools > have been built with kerberos support. Despite the fact that you're not > using kerberos, ssl.h needs kssl.h, and kssl.h needs krb5.h; as such you > at least need the kerberos includes to be available. > > I must say that I'm surprised the #include <kssl.h> in ssl.h isn't > #ifdef'ed to only be required when kerberos will be used. Then again, my > C programming knowledge is poor to nil. > >> * Could this have something to do with SASL >> configuration? > > I really couldn't tell you. I doubt it - I think the problem is the way > RH have configured their openssl libs - but I'm not even remotely sure. > > If the suggestions offered above don't solve your problem then... well, > frankly I can't remember how I worked around it. Perhaps editing the > Makefile to add the include manually might do the trick? > > Craig Ringer > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- Tjenesten mail.adventuras.no ble levert av Adventuras Web Agency http://www.adventuras.no/
