On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, William K. Hardeman wrote: > Funny. I saw that in the IMSP server sources and didn't even twig that it > was "imap" instead of "imsp", otherwise I would have modified the server > sources. > > Wouldn't it be better if this were filed as a bug with CMU and get the > service name changed in the server sources? That, to me, would seem to be > the better way to handle this going forward, since imap and imsp are two > different services.
Thats the problem with a lack of standardization of this protocol. Unfortuinately, *all* of the deployment is using "imap" as the service name. Changing this now will break *all* deployed software. I'm not about to do that. At best, it could be made a config option. -Rob -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Rob Siemborski * Andrew Systems Group * Cyert Hall 207 * 412-268-7456 Research Systems Programmer * /usr/contributed Gatekeeper --- Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html