Hi,
Eric S. Pulley wrote:
Question: Are people looking at this as both redundancy and performance, or just redundance?
Cyrus performs pretty well already. Background redundancy would be awesome. Especially if we had control over when the syncing process occurred either via time interval or date/time.
I would say not at an interval but as soon as there is an action performed on one mailbox, the other one would be pushed to do something. I believe that is called rolling replication.
I would not be really happy with a interval synchronisation. It would make it harder to use both platforms at the same time, and that is what I want as well. So there is a little-bit of load-balancing involved, but more and more _availability_.
Being able to use both platforms at the same time maybe implies that there is either no master/slave role or that this is auto-elected between the two and that this role is floating...
Paul
--- Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
