On Sat, 18 Sep 2004, Ken Murchison wrote:
I'm not sure that IMAP is ameniable to active-active: the prevalence of UIDs in the protocol means that it would be very hard to resolve the inconsistencies that would occur if a pair of machines ever lost touch.
Right, I was assuming that active-passive is what we would probably get, I was just taking the pulse of the community.
In the past I have attempted to steer things internally at work toward active-active solutions, but I think expecting that here will result in an unrealistically complex solution to deploy, if implemented.
---
Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
