Quick search of the web for 'sieve cyrus' brings this up as first result:
http://www.cyrusoft.com/sieve/
Its the main reference that I use, and has some very extensive examples ...
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Forrest Aldrich wrote:
The Sieve web page states:
At present, there is no mailing list or newsgroup for end users of Sieve.
I'm curious, how is it expected Sieve will be more widely adopted with 1) limited documentation (ie: not end-user friendly) and 2) no formal resources to discuss the protocol/language.
I'm faced with converting a system to Cyrus that, for a long time, has been running procmail successfully. How can I make a positive argument for Cyrus and Sieve based upon the above problems?
I know there are ways to use procmail with Cyrus IMAPD, but doesn't appear easy - and there appear to be caveats. Cyrus IMAPD is intended to run on a closed system, to (desirable), so the two items (Cyrus IMAPD and Procmail) don't really mix well, in my opinion.
As a sysadmin, it would be invaluable for me to have more reference material, friendly documentation, examples...
Unfortunately, on a related note, the people O'Reily do not have any future plans for an updated Managing IMAP book, which I think would be an appropriate place for this perhaps.
I've spent a significant amount of time perusing the net for resources - I found Websieve, great - but that doesn't help me educate end users on how to use this.
Thoughts?
---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 --- Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
