Does this patch fix the problem? Will it be accepted into Cyrus?
Alec
On Aug 18, 2005, at 15:24, Scott Russell wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We had the same thing. It's a bug in cyrus (off by one) so when
they read their own null from the buffer they complain the message
has a null. We patched it. We also sent the patch into cyrus.
Was the patch accepted? I'm not sure when the patch went to the
cyrus folks but being on the list I don't recall seeing it go by.
I'm curious if this will make it into future versions of cyrus.
--- cyrus-imapd-2.2.12/imap/spool.c 2004-10-27
16:40:50.000000000 -0400
+++ cyrus-imapd-2.2.12p10/imap/spool.c 2005-05-27
17:25:09.000000000 -0400
@@ -451,9 +455,9 @@
p[1] = '\n';
p[2] = '\0';
}
- else if (p[0] != '\n' && (strlen(buf) < sizeof(buf)-2)) {
+ else if (p[0] != '\n' && (strlen(buf) < sizeof(buf)-3)) {
/* line contained a \0 not at the end */
r = IMAP_MESSAGE_CONTAINSNULL;
continue;
}
--
Scott Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IBM Linux Technology Center System Admin
----
Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
!DSPAM:4305019b26714647417383!
----
Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
