Brian Awood wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:34:02 +0200, "Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems)"
> 
> <vanmeeu...@kolabsys.com> wrote:
> > Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> >> My other point, of course, was that since the PostgreSQL guys worked to
> >> fix a couple of bugs in cvs2git over the past couple of weeks, you may
> >> get a better result if you grab the tip version of cvs2git and re-run
> >> the conversion.
> > 
> > If we were using cvs2git, sure! But we're not using cvs2git, we're using
> > git-cvsimport ;-)
> 
> I would highly recommend cvs2git over git-cvsimport for reproducing an
> accurate history of the cvs repository.  cvs2git doesn't do incremental
> imports like cvsimport, but I don't think that is needed in this situation.
>  You may want to give it a try, just for a comparison anyway.
> 

I'm not sure what I am to understand from this. I've done thousands of 
conversions both with cvs2git as well as git-cvsimport. If you think there is 
a problem with git-cvsimport I may be unaware of, or there is a solution 
cvs2git has implemented that may or may not have been an actual problem with 
git-cvsimport, please point those out.

Kind regards,

-- 
Jeroen van Meeuwen
Senior Engineer, Kolab Systems AG

e: vanmeeu...@kolabsys.com
t: +316 42 801 403
w: http://www.kolabsys.com

pgp: 9342 BF08
----
Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/

Reply via email to