On 12/07/2010 04:11 PM, Bron Gondwana wrote: > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 09:26:15AM -0400, Patrick Boutilier wrote: >> I didn't think changes on the replica would be reflected on the >> primary, Bron can verify though. >> >> Are you saying that when mail older than 150 days was purged on the >> replica they also got purged on the primary? > > Yes, that's correct - if you actually purge a message on the replica > that change is replicated back to the master. The idea is that these > ends can be used interchangably - and so an expunge at one end has to > be mirrored at the other.
That is new in 2.4 though, correct? In 2.3.x replication was only one way? <snip> ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
