Food for thought. Maybe instead of having one "%SHARED" backup, having one
"%SHARED.foo" backup per top-level shared folder would be a better implementation? I
haven't seen shared folders used much in practice, so it's interesting to hear about it.
Looking at your own data, if you had one "%SHARED.foo" backup per top level shared
folder, would they be roughly user-sized pieces, or still too big? If too big, how deep would you
need to go down the tree until the worst offenders are a manageable size? (If I make it split
shared folders like this, maybe "how-deep-to-split-shared-folders" needs to be a
configuration parameter, because I guess it'll vary from installation to installation.)
For my data, %SHARED.foo would be the perfect granularity level. Each
foo is a shared email address like "sales" or "accounts" and it gets
about as much traffic as a user account does. (Two months ago when we
were on Exchange, they _were_ user accounts.)
foo also includes "#calendars" and "#addressbooks" on my server so there
are weird characters to deal with.
--
Deborah Pickett
System Administrator
Polyfoam Australia Pty Ltd
----
Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
To Unsubscribe:
https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus
