[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adam Sjøgren) writes: > On Tue, 27 May 2008 12:57:31 -0700, Daniel wrote: >> I've never used mailfilter so I need to make certain of this, but I >> believe mailreaver is more or less a drop-in replacement: their >> headers and training files are identical. So I think the proper >> approach is to use mailreaver if it exists on the system, or >> mailfilter if it doesn't. > > Does that mean that setting spam-crm114-program to point to > mailreaver.crm instead of mailfilter.crm is sufficient?
No. The command-line arguments are still different. -- Daniel Franke [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.dfranke.us |----| =|\ \\\\ || * | -|-\--------- Man is free at the instant he wants to be. -----| =| \ /// --Voltaire _______________________________________________ info-gnus-english mailing list info-gnus-english@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
