Hello, On Mar 30, 11:03 pm, Ted Zlatanov <t...@lifelogs.com> wrote: > On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 06:33:13 -0700 (PDT) Francis Moreau > <francis.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > FM> On Mar 30, 3:27 pm, Ted Zlatanov <t...@lifelogs.com> wrote: > > >> If you never need both, just remove the Bcc header if the Gcc is set, > >> effectively making it an XOR. > > FM> yes but how should I do this ? > > You could add this to your message-send-hook: > > (save-restriction > (message-narrow-to-headers) > (when (and (message-fetch-field "Gcc") > (message-fetch-field "Bcc")) > (message-remove-header "Gcc"))) > > You can test it in your message buffer, just paste and evaluate (`C-x > C-e' after the final parenthesis).
Thank you Ted, for giving me a solution. I tried to remove "Bcc" header field instead of "Gcc" (as your example do) but it doesn't work I still receive 2 copies of the email. Do you know why ? The reason for the change is that I prefer the way gnus handles "Gcc" header, because in that case I don't actually receive new email in my spool box (it's directly moved to my nnml:Inbox folder) and the mail is marked as read automatically. If I send a message by using 'compose-mail', I will have all drawbacks I mentioned previously but that doesn't matter in this case because I send emails this way much less often. Thanks _______________________________________________ info-gnus-english mailing list info-gnus-english@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english