Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerde...@web.de> writes:

> I would suggest to at least do the following:
>
> (1) Provide an `article' variable.  Maybe also provide `processable' as
> suggested and/or `sec-mark' (somewhere in the code the process mark is
> called a "secondary mark")?

I think everything that's not a readedness mark is a secondary mark
(like % and the like).

> (2) make the docstring of `gnus-summary-highlight' say that arbitrary
> expressions are allowed, and that they are evaluated with point
> positioned on the according article's line.
>
> For (1), AFAIU two places would need to be changed:
> `gnus-summary-highlight-line' and `gnus-tree-highlight-node'.  Seems to
> be simple to do.

Sounds good to me -- patches welcome.  :-)


_______________________________________________
info-gnus-english mailing list
info-gnus-english@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english

Reply via email to