Hi lately I am back to use gnus-registry-set-article-DONE-mark and
friends, however when call one of the functions I obtain 


#+begin_src 
[]{ }O. 165767 [ +User1] UWE RICHAR  [Sobre la Hoja 3                           
             ] Wed, 10 Sep 2025 21:28:25 +0200 11k 45   
#+end_src

I add a label via =gnus-registry-set-article-TODO-mark=

And then obtain 

#+begin_src 
[TODO]{ }O. 165767 [ +User1] UWE RICHAR  [Sobre la Hoja 3                       
                 ] Wed, 10 Sep 2025 21:28:25 +0200 11k 45   
[]{ }O. 165767 [ +User1] UWE RICHAR  [Sobre la Hoja 3                           
             ] Wed, 10 Sep 2025 21:28:25 +0200 11k 45   
#+end_src

And I have to run =gnus-summary-prepare= to obtain 
#+begin_src 
[TODO]{ }O. 165767 [ +User1] UWE RICHAR  [Sobre la Hoja 3                       
                 ] Wed, 10 Sep 2025 21:28:25 +0200 11k 45   
[]{ }O. 165767 [ +User1] UWE RICHAR  [Sobre la Hoja 3                           
             ] Wed, 10 Sep 2025 21:28:25 +0200 11k 45   
#+end_src


That is annoying, here is a workaround


(defun my-gnus-refresh-summary (&rest _args)
  "Refresh the Gnus summary buffer non-intrusively, keeping point on the same 
article."
  (when (derived-mode-p 'gnus-summary-mode)
    (let ((article (gnus-summary-article-number))) ;; remember current article
      (save-window-excursion
        (gnus-summary-prepare))
      (when article
        (gnus-summary-goto-article article)))))



(dolist (fn '(gnus-registry-set-article-DONE-mark
              gnus-registry-set-article-Imp-mark
              gnus-registry-set-article-Later-mark
              gnus-registry-set-article-TODO-mark
              gnus-registry-set-article-WAIT-mark
              gnus-registry-remove-article-DONE-mark
              gnus-registry-remove-article-Imp-mark
              gnus-registry-remove-article-Later-mark
              gnus-registry-remove-article-TODO-mark
              gnus-registry-remove-article-WAIT-mark))
  (advice-add fn :after #'my-gnus-refresh-summary))


Thoughts?

Uwe Brauer 


Reply via email to