Techs, I just found this info
on the W2Knews site. It has answered a lot of my questions about 64 bit. The
comment that I found the most interesting is the shelf life of the new 64 bit
systems, much longer than our current systems. I’m thinking that I’m
going to wait until I can get good 64 bit machines. So far it looks like the
AMD processor is a better choice than any forthcoming Intel processor. George * Who Wants 64-bit
Windows? Microsoft will ship the
Windows Server 2003 x64 Editions this month. They will be sold with new server
hardware. Why would you want this? There are some very good reasons actually.
First, the 64-bit architecture has more memory address space which means better
performance: bigger memory, page files, cache etc. Second, soon all the new
hardware you can get will be 64-bit by default. Third, soon there will be
x64-based versions of SQL Server, Exchange, and Office. And Visual Studio 2005
will support native x64 development of code. Fourth, 64-bit machines and
software will have a longer shelf life. Think it through for a moment, these
machines may not need replacement for 5-6 years instead of the 3-4 year
replacement cycle most of us are on now. The one major problem?
Device drivers. You have to make sure that all the devices you hook up to your
systems are compatible. Paul Thurrott's supersite has a good overview of the
different 64-bit Windows editions and a great grid that explains which flavor
supports how many processors and RAM. Recommended. http://www.w2knews.com/rd/rd.cfm?id=050411ED-64-Bit ---- |
- RE: [info-tech] 64 bit George Tuttle
- RE: [info-tech] 64 bit Kurt McKenney