On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 02:07:21AM -0500, Eyal Edri wrote: > Karsten 'quiad' Wade wrote: > > One question is, are we running plain KVM or will we try an oVirt > > setup on any of these? > > I'd say let's eat our dogfood (but only stable one :) > Let's decide on the most stable oVirt version we have till now and use > it to manage it. It will show the community we have confidence in the > product and will surely be easier to manage with webadmin rather than > virsh/kvm.
While I haven't actually tried oVirt on a single system, it feels like quite some overhead. But dogfooding is good and I do see benefits in the API. Let's look ahead and suppose we get more physical machines but in different datacenters; could we use the same oVirt to manage those phyiscal machines and would we want to? If so that's a huge plus for oVirt. > and it'll give us a chance to integration foreman with ovirt and > jenkins :) +1 on this integration (though plain libvirt gives us quite some as well). _______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra