> On 12 Jul 2016, at 09:19, Yaniv Kaul <yk...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Francesco Romani <from...@redhat.com > <mailto:from...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Dan Kenigsberg" <dan...@redhat.com <mailto:dan...@redhat.com>> > > To: "Nadav Goldin" <ngol...@redhat.com <mailto:ngol...@redhat.com>>, > > from...@redhat.com <mailto:from...@redhat.com> > > Cc: "Eyal Edri" <ee...@redhat.com <mailto:ee...@redhat.com>>, "Nir Soffer" > > <nsof...@redhat.com <mailto:nsof...@redhat.com>>, "Yaniv Kaul" > > <yk...@redhat.com <mailto:yk...@redhat.com>>, "Martin > > Perina" <mper...@redhat.com <mailto:mper...@redhat.com>>, "Tolik Litovsky" > > <tlito...@redhat.com <mailto:tlito...@redhat.com>>, "infra" > > <infra@ovirt.org <mailto:infra@ovirt.org>> > > Sent: Monday, July 11, 2016 10:12:48 PM > > Subject: Re: Build failed in Jenkins: ovirt_master_system-tests #243 > > > > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 07:00:35PM +0300, Nadav Goldin wrote: > > > Seems like [1], as ovirt-srv19 has fresh new FC24 installation, > > > virtlogd is not enabled by default: > > > ● virtlogd.service - Virtual machine log manager > > > Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/virtlogd.service; indirect; > > > vendor preset: disabled) > > > Active: inactive (dead) > > > Docs: man:virtlogd(8) > > > http://libvirt.org <http://libvirt.org/> > > > we can add it to puppet for now. > > > > > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290357 > > > <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290357> > > > > Francesco, shouldn't vdsm require virtlogd explicitly? > > Disclaimer: I didn't read yet the rest of the thread. > > We choose not to, trying to prevent issues: > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/55189/1 <https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/55189/1> > Related-To: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318902 > <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318902> > > I thought and still do it's quite a mistake - if we think a feature of our > friends from libvirt is immature - we should tell them that, hopefully > accompanied by bugs.
It’s not so much feature itself, rather it’s integration into OSes. I think there was enough feedback, a random google search shows a load of issues reported at the time this dependency was introduced, so I hope they learned from it > I'd like to believe they don't enable features by default unless they believe > the features are mature and ready for general consumption. If that's not the > case, we should talk with them. IMO it was a bit hasty on their part, and we just didn’t have time to resolve all the virtlogd daemon management in RHEL and RHEVH in time Thanks, michal > Y. > > > We want to reenable and require it in the near future: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321010 > <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321010> > > HTH, > > -- > Francesco Romani > RedHat Engineering Virtualization R & D > Phone: 8261328 > IRC: fromani >
_______________________________________________ Infra mailing list Infra@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
