Barak Korren created OVIRT-1548:
-----------------------------------

             Summary: Better STD-CI for GitHub
                 Key: OVIRT-1548
                 URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OVIRT-1548
             Project: oVirt - virtualization made easy
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: oVirt CI
            Reporter: Barak Korren
            Assignee: infra
            Priority: High


We currently have some support for crating STD-CI jobs for projects running on 
GitHub. There are however, several issues with it:

* The job templates you use for GitHub are different then the ones you use for 
Gerrit:
** Job names need to contain '\-github-'
** In Gerrit you need a separate 'project' entry for the 'build-artifacts' 
jobs, in GitHub you need a separate one for 'check-patch'.
** SCM checkout details are specified in the 'project' entry as opposed to a 
separate SCM file (We might want to adopt this for Gerrit).
* The 'check-patch' jobs do not have full STC-CI. They don't run the post-build 
steps.
* The triggering scheme is strange:
** All jobs trigger when certain messages are posted in the PR comments.
** Nothing is triggered automatically (As opposed to Gerrit where CI runs as 
soon as a patchset is submitted)
** Nothing triggers when a PR is merged (As opposed to with Gerrit where 
'check-merged' and 'build-artifacts' are triggered on merge).
* The white-listing scheme is different:
** The 'jenkins-whiltelist' file does not effect theses jobs at all.
** GitHub project/organisation membership determines white-listing
** white-listing is determined by who added the comment to run CI, not who 
authored the patch.

Some of these issues and differences had already been tracked in other tickets. 
This ticket is for concentrating all related work. Other related tickets will 
be linked to it as blockers.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v1000.1131.0#100055)
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
Infra@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra

Reply via email to