[ 
https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OST-99?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=35928#comment-35928
 ] 

Greg Sheremeta commented on OST-99:
-----------------------------------

> I would not start with the container

I'm close to having something pretty nice with docker-compose and the docker 
API via OST :)

> new ui_sanity scenario for basic_suite -- need multiple firefoxes and chromium
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OST-99
>                 URL: https://ovirt-jira.atlassian.net/browse/OST-99
>             Project: oVirt system tests
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Greg Sheremeta
>            Assignee: infra
>
> I'm writing a suite that does headless UI testing. One goal is to open 
> headless firefox and actually open the UI, perform a login, make sure things 
> look good, make sure there are no ui.log errors, etc. I'll also eventually 
> add chromium, which can run headless now too.
> The suite requires several firefox versions to be installed on the test 
> machine, along with chromium. There are also some binary components required, 
> geckodriver and chromedriver. These are not packaged.
> Ideally the browsers can be installed to /opt/firefox55, /opt/firefox56, 
> /opt/chromium62, etc. on the machine running the suite. So I think it makes 
> sense to maintain a custom rpm with all of this.
> Where can this rpm live? What is a reliable way to do this? (I know we want 
> to avoid copr.)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100081)
_______________________________________________
Infra mailing list
Infra@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra

Reply via email to