On 3 July 2018 at 12:26, Martin Perina <mper...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 11:03 AM, Ehud Yonasi <eyon...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Suspected patch: >> ​​ >> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/91555/ >> >> Link to job: >> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/8542/ >> >> Link to all logs: >> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-teste >> r/8542/artifact/exported-artifacts/ >> >> Relevant error snippet: >> >> Error: ovirt-engine-wildfly-overlay conflicts with >> ovirt-engine-wildfly-13.0.0-1.el7.x86_64 >> >> > ​OK​, I thought that I can do stepped approach: > > 1. Push ovirt-engine-wildfly-13 RPM into the repos > 2. Push ovirt-engine-wildfly-overlay-13 RPM, which requires > ovirt-engine-wildfly-13, into repos > > But it seems that due to serial nature of our CQ it's not possible, so can > we pass both patches [1] and [2] though CQ at once? > > Ehud will handle pushing them through the CQ together (its a matter of timing things so they both get added to the CQ while it is busy with other things).
I wonder - could we merge those projects together to avoid this situation in the future? What is the relationship between 'ovirt-engine-wildfly' and the Wildfly upstream? -- Barak Korren RHV DevOps team , RHCE, RHCi Red Hat EMEA redhat.com | TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED. | redhat.com/trusted
_______________________________________________ Infra mailing list -- infra@ovirt.org To unsubscribe send an email to infra-le...@ovirt.org Privacy Statement: https://www.ovirt.org/site/privacy-policy/ oVirt Code of Conduct: https://www.ovirt.org/community/about/community-guidelines/ List Archives: https://lists.ovirt.org/archives/list/infra@ovirt.org/message/MJIFEI4U3M4SJHEP7GO4CJLHHYO2SOEI/
