On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 17:13 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > Ok this may seem silly, but after wading through a bunch of kickstarts > today trying to find out which ones are for what.. could we > standardize on a convention? We have a couple :). > > I like this one: > > <host type>-<os>-<os-release>-<special> > > Examples. > kvm-rhel-5-nfs > xen-rhel-6-nohd > hardware-rhel-5-xenserver > hardware-rhel-5-nohd > > Once we have a convention, I can go and rename stuff to meet it (maybe > put the kickstarts under a git tree also?)
under a git, tree, sure - but do not, do not, do not, split the git tree into staging/production branches. There's no point in that for the kickstarts. also - unless there is a compelling reason to - why don't we assume that all new builds are rhel6 - and therefore kvm? -sv _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
