On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 12:28 PM Owen Taylor <otay...@redhat.com> wrote: > * In fedscm_admin: Map flatpaks namespace to the ‘module’ PDC branch > type when storing the SLA into the PDC, to avoid PDC changes, and > because the SLA really is a module SLA.
Digging into this, I don't think this is right - it would break the 1:1 mapping between pagure branches and "component branches" in PDC that we currently have and the scripts count on. I think the right thing is: * Modify the ReleaseComponentType table in the PDC database to add 'flatpak' [ Or could be done by adding a migration to the PDC codebase, adding the redeploying, but considering that we're working on replacing the PDC, doesn't seem worthwhile.] Owen _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
