On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 10:48 PM Dusty Mabe <du...@dustymabe.com> wrote: > > > > On 5/1/19 10:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 18:57 +0530, Sinny Kumari wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 4:47 PM Kamil Paral <kpa...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> > >>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:39 AM Sinny Kumari <ksi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 12:19 AM Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Or could we move f29+ all to whatever is replacing it? (taskotron?) > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> It will be nice but I am not aware of any other system in place which > >>>> would > >>>> replace checks performed by autocloud. > >>>> > >>>> (CC'ed tflink and kparal) > >>>> Does taskotron provides capability to perform tests on Fedora cloud > >>>> Images like booting images and other basic checks? > >>>> > >>> > >>> Theoretically it is possible using nested virt. However, Taskotron is > >>> going away as well. The replacement is Fedora CI: > >>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/ci/ > >>> > >> > >> Thanks kamil! yeah, it doesn't make sense to move to Taskotron if it is > >> going to be deprecated as well. > >> > >> > >>> I recommend to ask in the CI list: > >>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ci%40lists.fedoraproject.org/ > >>> > >>> It should be possible for them to provide the infrastructure you need. > >>> > >> > >> Hmm, I am not very sure if we should spend time investigating and setting > >> up alternative > >> to autocloud unless we have usecases for long run. Fedora Atomic Host Two > >> Week releases ends with F29 EOL. > > > > We could run these tests in openQA pretty easily, I think. The question > > is, I guess, whether they will still be of value for Fedora CoreOS. > > > > I guess to me the real job Autocloud is doing is this: "make sure the > > images we intend people to use to run Fedora instances in the cloud > > basically work and can do some simple tasks people tend to do with such > > images". If the Fedora CoreOS team already is covering this some other > > way, or intends to cover it some other way before Fedora CoreOS becomes > > a supported thing, then we probably don't need to preserve the > > Autocloud tests. If this is not in scope for the Fedora CoreOS > > team...we probably still need to do it somewhere else. > > > > So...has anyone asked the Fedora CoreOS team what the plans here are? > > :) > > We plan to have testing at various stages of the CoreOS build and delivery > pipeline. We definitely plan to have FCOS taken care of using the existing > kola testing utility [1] that was in use previously for container linux. > > With that said, one thing that has previously been out of scope for kola is > testing instances that aren't provisioned with ignition (i.e. they use > cloud-init > instead). Today the Fedora Cloud base images are not provisioned using > ignition so > we'll either need to consider adding ignition as an option there OR consider > running > automated tests against the Fedora Cloud base images in OpenQA (if that's > possible). >
It's all possible with OpenQA, the tests just have to be written. :) -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
