Thanks for the info, I renamed the tags and updated the tickets. Why is naming so hard?
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 4:58 PM Merlin Mathesius <mmath...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 3:32 PM Mohan Boddu <mbo...@bhujji.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I created the tags as module-epel8-build and >> module-epel8-playground-build just to be consistent with the naming, so you >> need to change the config for koji_tag part. >> >> And may be also change the "stream" in the yaml file to epel8 and >> epel8-playground and change the name of the platform to platform-epel8 and >> platform-epel8-playground, again just for consistency. >> >> Other than that, its LGTM. >> > > Thanks for taking a look. > > There was discussion about the "el8" vs "epel8" naming during the > preliminary review and discussion. It should be "el8" to work correctly > with RHEL 8 as explained in Petr's comment at > https://pagure.io/Fedora-Infra/ansible/pull-request/40#comment-96326. > > But yeah, it keeps tripping me up, too! > > >> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 3:43 PM Merlin Mathesius <mmath...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Now that the build tags have been created (thanks, Mohan!), we should be >>> ready to add the virtual platform module definitions for EPEL-8 to Fedora >>> staging MBS. >>> >>> I have attached a revised patch that includes both the el8 and >>> el8-playground definitions in a single patch file. Aside from the combined >>> patch, the only difference from the previous separate patches is the >>> addition of the 'default_modules_scm_url' and 'use_default_modules' >>> settings to enable ursa prime. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> Merlin >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 5:07 PM Merlin Mathesius <mmath...@redhat.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 12:41 PM Matt Prahl <mpr...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Merlin, >>>>> I can't think of anything that you need to do before merging and >>>>> deploying them as long as the Koji tags mentioned in the modulemd files >>>>> are >>>>> all set. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Of course. We need the module-el8-build and module-el8-playground-build >>>> tags. I just created https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8865 for that. >>>> >>>> Thanks, Matt! >>>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 12:12 PM Merlin Mathesius <mmath...@redhat.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, Matt, Jan, >>>>>> >>>>>> Could one of you provide some input here? >>>>>> >>>>>> We're looking to add the virtual platform module definitions for >>>>>> EPEL-8 to Fedora staging MBS. Is there anything specific that needs to >>>>>> happen before merging and deploying them? >>>>>> >>>>>> If you'd like to review the definitions, the patches are re-attached >>>>>> to this message so you don't need to go digging. >>>>>> >>>>>> Merlin >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 11:43 AM Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 02:14:14PM -0500, Merlin Mathesius wrote: >>>>>>> > Hi, all, >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Since folks seem to be happy with the el8 platform virtual module >>>>>>> > definitions, can they be merged and deployed to staging--or does >>>>>>> something >>>>>>> > else need to happen first? (Of course, any module builds based on >>>>>>> > platform:el8* won't be usable until there are corresponding pungi >>>>>>> configs.) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm not entirely sure. :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can we ask some of the mbs folks what all is needed here? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> kevin >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> infrastructure mailing list -- >>>>>>> infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org >>>>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to >>>>>>> infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >>>>>>> Fedora Code of Conduct: >>>>>>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >>>>>>> List Guidelines: >>>>>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >>>>>>> List Archives: >>>>>>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> Matt Prahl >>>>> >>>>> Senior Software Engineer, PnT DevOps >>>>> >>>>> Red Hat <https://www.redhat.com/> >>>>> >>>>> Westford, MA >>>>> >>>>> mpr...@redhat.com >>>>> M: 802-999-0972 IM: mprahl >>>>> <https://red.ht/sig> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> To unsubscribe send an email to >>> infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> Fedora Code of Conduct: >>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >>> List Archives: >>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to >> infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org >> > _______________________________________________ > infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to > infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org >
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org