On Tue, 24 Nov 2020 at 23:02, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 12:18:54PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 18. 11. 20 v 2:11 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > > > We are close to replacing this app with a new setup... > > > > > > see the 'packages app' thread in this very list. ;) > > > > Did we come to conclusion which app (out of these two) we are going to > deploy? > > Well, I personally thought it would be better to go with the community > maintained one. Less work for you/your team, more respectfull of the > work they already put into this, and I know you and your team are busy. > > > > If that will be the fedora-packages-ng I will be happy to proceed and > spin up VM in AWS and update playbooks. I just > > need the green light :) > > If that helps, I can promise that CPT (aka Copr) team will maintain it. > > Thats great, and if that was the only choice I would be very happy... > however, we have another community maintained/created one. :( > > > On 11/24/20 5:18 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > Dne 18. 11. 20 v 2:11 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): > > > > We are close to replacing this app with a new setup... > > > > > > > > see the 'packages app' thread in this very list. ;) > > > Did we come to conclusion which app (out of these two) we are going to > deploy? > > > > Timothée and I submitted a solution in April. It would be great if > > packages-static could be adopted. > > > > I have been consistently responding to all discussions on the mailing > list. > > I did respond to the thread back in September. Kevin said you were busy > and > > suggested -static and -ng be tested. I have submitted an RFR since then. > I > > have time to maintain packages-static and I am still looking for a > favorable > > decision. > > > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/SYM6OT4BGDOWF7EGOGG75YG5LOXB7XMF/#YD5TFWZHBITXZBA35KDELKDGXANCH5E6 > > > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9441 > > Yeah, I have had no time to work on deploying this, but it should be > pretty short work for any of the folks who have deployed apps in our > openshift. > > I'd personally go with static, but perhaps thats just me. >
Yeah I think we should give a chance to the static solution, which seems to be the easier to maintain and run on the long term. > > I would love to hear from more feedback one way or another. > > Miroslav: what do you think? would you be ok if we went with static and > in the event something didn't work there or we needed more functionality > down the road we could move to ng then and in the mean time less work > for you? > > Please chime in everyone. :) > > kevin > _______________________________________________ > infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to > infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org >
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
