On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 02:27:47PM +0200, Aurelien Bompard wrote: > > > - either "dev", "devel", or "develop" > > > > Had a quick look, and there are over 50 already at "develop" as the > > main branch. -- most of the others are 'main' or 'master' -- so it > > looks like 'develop' is a bit of a standard already. > > > > Alright. I think I've setup most of the projects that have a "dev" branch. > I knew I'd have to pay for my lazy fingers one day.
I think many used 'develop' because it was part of 'git flow' which many of the infra developers used to be proponents of. https://datasift.github.io/gitflow/IntroducingGitFlow.html In that model people did work in feature/bug branches, and then merged to 'develop' to stablize/test/integrate, then it merged to master for a release. Anyhow, just a bit of history why we seem to have so many develop branches. :) kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
