On Tue, 6 Sept 2022 at 12:34, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 09:45:11AM -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > ....snip... > > > > I am wondering if some of these lists would be better using something > like > > public inbox https://lwn.net/Articles/748184/ like sourceware is using > > https://inbox.sourceware.org/. Various announcement lists and things > like > > scm-commits do not need to have interactive webpages like mailman3 > > hyperkitty give since they are limited to few people. > > I've often pondered setting up public-inbox, but then we have another > thing to maintain, and it's got some...limitations... like expecting > everything to be plain text. > > But it's a thought... > > I was thinking this might be only for some high bandwidth lists which are primarily read-only. scm-commits and maybe a list for fedora-message emails.
-- Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle. -- Ian MacClaren
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
