On Mon, 26 Sept 2022 at 17:56, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > Here's my thoughts on rhel9 upgrades. > > We have 188 RHEL7 or RHEL8 instances (counting both vm's and bare > hardware). > > > Some will just not move anytime soon: > > Is it possible to look at these as 'why does this need fedmsg?' 'what happens if it doesn't have fedmsg', and 'do we need it?'
mailman01 is one where maybe not having it on fedmsg wouldn't be earth shattering but it also has the bigger problem of all its libraries being FTBFS in Fedora and being retired from there. At which point we go with 'do we need to run mailing lists?' > busgateway - needs fedmsg, only in epel7 > fedimg - needs fedmsg. will be replaced by some other solution > github2fedmsg - needs fedmsg, only in epel7 > mailman01 - needs fedmsg > nuancer - needs fedmsg > osbs - needs new container build system > pdc - needs to be retired > > Finally, some I am not sure about and would like input: > > mbs - is this ready for rhel9? Should we move to Fedora instead? > odcs - how about this? > > So, as far as help goes, getting mirrormanager2 and pagure all in epel9 > would be great... > coming up with a fedmsg-irc replacement, and getting limnoria in epel9 > seem to be the best ways right now. > I can start on the easier reinstalls. > -- Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle. -- Ian MacClaren
_______________________________________________ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
