> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 07:58:14AM +0000, Mattia Verga wrote:
>
> No objection at all from me. ;)
>
> I have been very conservative in updating this stack since I don't want
> to break bodhi. If we can upgrade things and confirm bodhi is happy I am
> all for it. ;)
>
> kevin
So, after Pyramid 2.0 was pushed to F38, Bodhi integration tests started to
fail.
It seems that, despite Pyramid docs say that legacy authentication should still
work [1], bodhi-client authentication fail.
devel/ci/integration/tests/test_bodhi_tasks.py::test_update_edit FAILED [100%]
{"status": "error", "errors": [{"location": "body", "name": "HTTPForbidden",
"description": "Unauthorized: new_update__POST failed permission check"}]}
I think we're still in time to retire the change proposal and fall back to
Pyramid 1.x by untag everything related to the update, or we can proceed and
work on updating / fixing Bodhi before F37 goes EOL and we're forced to upgrade
to F38 or higher.
I'm not sure how hard could be upgrade the authentication/authorization to the
new method.
Thoughts?
Mattia
[1]
https://docs.pylonsproject.org/projects/pyramid/en/latest/whatsnew-2.0.html#upgrading-auth-20
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
