On Thu, Apr 03, 2025 at 12:32:48AM -0500, Carl George via infrastructure wrote:
> The EPEL Steering Committee has realized that the original plan for
> EPEL 10 repos will cause some upgrade path problems.  This is
> explained in further detail in this issue:
> 
> https://pagure.io/epel/issue/324
> 
> To address this, we'd like to make some changes to the EPEL 10
> portions of the new-updates-sync script and the mirrormanager scanner
> repo mappings.  This is set up already in this pull request:
> 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/2557
> 
> I feel like these changes are relatively safe for a freeze break and
> shouldn't impact Fedora in any way.  In the unlikely event this
> doesn't go as planned, we can roll it back by reverting the pull
> request.
> 
> Can I get some +1's for this plan?

+1 here.

kevin
-- 
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to