hello, i thought about the versionnumbers and i see, we should change something: i think, it's simpler to count simple. example: old style: 0.1-rc1, 0.1-rc2, 0.1, 0.1.1, 0.1.2 better is: 0.1, 0.1.1, 0.1.2, 0.1.3, 0.1.4, 0.1.5
and why? the question is, why we use rc? it's simplier to count from 0. then we say to everybody, 0.1.3 is the first stable version, instead 0.1 should be the first stable version. most times, we see, that the stable version isn't stable. for example initng-0.6.4. now we do it right: every version is unstable and if we tested it, we say, it's stable. if it we see, there are bugs, then we release "initng-0.6.4.1". who can say, that -rc1 can't be stable? it's easier to say .0 ist unstable and later we say, wrong, it's stable. right? deac
pgpO036Zj10ub.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ Initng mailing list [email protected] http://jw.dyndns.org/mailman/listinfo/initng
