> Slightly changing the topic, allow me to report what happened on my
> Gentoo system.
> I was reading the "TIP kexec" at the Gentoo Wiki, and it told me that I
> had to issue /etc/init.d/kexec start.
> It would load the kernel image, so the system could later reboot by
> invoking said image.
> I thought that /etc/init.d/kexec was a a shell script, so I thought that
> I could execute it even though I was running initng. The result was
> very, very weird: I saw messages in my xterm that made it seem like my
> computer was being put in single mode (including the "Enter password for
> maintenance" message). But X was still runnning! When I dismissed the
> prompt to enter password (I don't remember now if I pressed ESC,
> control-D or control-C), my computer rebooted, without umounting
> partitions first.
>
> When I read the /etc/init.d/kexec script, I realized that the function I
> called should not reboot the computer (it merely loaded the kernel
> image, without invoking it). I then realized the #!/sbin/runscript at
> the top.
>
> "Oh... this thing is not a shell script. This thing probably thought
> that I was running under Sys V init and made something really crazy...".
>
> So nothing inside the script made the computer reboot. It was a weird
> consequence of running a /etc/init.d script in a system that booted with
> Initng.
> Of course, I should not have called /etc/init.d/kexec start. My bad.
> But can't we make the system fail in a more graceful manner than
> rebooting, when a clueless user executes a script in /etc/init.d?
>

I'm not sure what the problem could be...
do you have tried with other scripts?


No. Ill try later. (I'm busy now, and I'm afraid the computer will reboot if
I try...).

--
_______________________________________________
Initng mailing list
[email protected]
http://jw.dyndns.org/mailman/listinfo/initng





--
Software is like sex: it is better when it is free.
-- 
_______________________________________________
Initng mailing list
[email protected]
http://jw.dyndns.org/mailman/listinfo/initng

Reply via email to