Ok, i found out on irc that it's possible to specify runlevel on the bootprompt so Ismael thought it was better to keep the file extensions. So then it'll be:
/etc/initng/runlevel/default.runlevel /etc/initng/runlevel/system.virtual /etc/initng/runlevel/local.virtual Ismael Luceno wrote: > El domingo, 29 de julio de 2007 00:03 +0200, Jens Persson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > >> Buenas noches folks! >> > > Hi Jens. > > >> A while back I found out through che on irc that svn version of >> initng uses /etc/initng/default.runlevel as default instead of >> /etc/initng/runlevel/default.runlevel. Now this move back to the old >> one seems a bit odd to me as I thought that having a separate dir for >> runlevels was a good idea indeed. And it would be nice if there was a >> "local" runlevel file too as default. And if you have them in its own >> dir you can skip the file extensions alltogether. >> > > The change was made as a side effect of a limitation in service_file, > but that limitation is gone, so now we can go back to using a runlevel/ > dir. I've committed the necesary changes a few hours ago. > > >> Proposal for a default scheme: >> >> /etc/initng/runlevel/default -> Here you ONLY put which other >> runlevels to use! (just "system" and "local" in this example, no >> paths needed) /etc/initng/runlevel/system -> Here goes DISTRO >> SPECIFIC stuff that the user should not ever have to touch. >> /etc/initng/runlevel/local -> Here goes user specific stuff. >> >> It would make it "a lot" easier for different distros to help and >> support each other if there was a default scheme that worked out of >> the box. :D >> > > +1. > > >> And a little late but i vote yes on switching to gplv3. >> Keep up the good work all and looking forward to use Initng with the >> new shiny initng-scripts layout. >> >> greets jens >> >> -- _______________________________________________ Initng mailing list [email protected] http://jw.dyndns.org/mailman/listinfo/initng
